BUFQ vs PSFD
FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF against Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.
Fee gap
51 bp
PSFD is cheaper
1-year return gap
1.4 pts
BUFQ is ahead
Larger fund
BUFQ
$1.7B
Side by side
| BUFQ | PSFD | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF | Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF |
| Issuer | FT Vest | Pacer |
| Category | Buffer | Buffer |
| Expense ratio | 1.00% | 0.49% |
| Assets | $1.7B | $59M |
| Average daily dollar volume | $9.1M | $25K |
| Listed | Jun 15, 2022 | Dec 22, 2020 |
| FrenzyCap score | 33 | 36 |
| 1-month return | −0.9% | +0.5% |
| 3-month return | +4.7% | +4.0% |
| Year to date | +12.4% | +10.5% |
| 1-year return | +14.8% | +13.3% |
| 30-day volatility | 8.4% | 5.1% |
| Worst drawdown, 1 year | −5.4% | −5.9% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | — | — |
| Holdings | 5 | 6 |
| Top 10 weight | 100.0% | 102.9% |
| Look-through P/E | — | — |
| Holdings vs fair value | — | — |
| Holdings above 200-day average | — | — |
| Net flow, latest 3 reported months | +$155M thru May 2026 | −$988K thru Jul 2026 |
| 30-day implied volatility | — | — |
| Holdings as of | as of Oct 20, 2026issuer data | as of Jul 31, 2026SEC filing |
Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.
More: full overlap table · BUFQ holdings · PSFD holdings
Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.