BUFQ vs QMMY

FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF against FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - May: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
10 bp
QMMY is cheaper
1-year return gap
5.7 pts
BUFQ is ahead
Larger fund
BUFQ
$1.7B

Side by side

BUFQQMMY
FundFT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETFFT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - May
IssuerFT VestFT Vest
CategoryBufferBuffer
Expense ratio1.00%0.90%
Assets$1.7B$153M
Average daily dollar volume$9.1M$356K
ListedJun 15, 2022May 17, 2024
FrenzyCap score3315
1-month return−0.9%−1.0%
3-month return+4.7%+3.8%
Year to date+12.4%+7.2%
1-year return+14.8%+9.0%
30-day volatility8.4%9.1%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−5.4%−4.9%
Trailing 12-month yield——
Holdings55
Top 10 weight100.0%102.7%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$155M thru May 2026+$32M thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Oct 20, 2026issuer dataas of Oct 20, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · BUFQ holdings · QMMY holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.