BUFQ vs STEN

FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF against iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Sep ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
50 bp
STEN is cheaper
1-year return gap
0.7 pts
BUFQ is ahead
Larger fund
BUFQ
$1.7B

Side by side

BUFQSTEN
FundFT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETFiShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Sep ETF
IssuerFT VestiShares
CategoryBufferBuffer
Expense ratio1.00%0.50%
Assets$1.7B$57M
Average daily dollar volume$9.1M$935K
ListedJun 15, 2022Sep 30, 2025
FrenzyCap score3339
1-month return−0.9%−0.0%
3-month return+4.7%+4.8%
Year to date+12.4%+12.3%
1-year return+14.8%+14.1%
30-day volatility8.4%8.6%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−5.4%−6.2%
Trailing 12-month yield—0.28%
Holdings58
Top 10 weight100.0%103.1%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$155M thru May 2026$0 thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Oct 20, 2026issuer dataas of Oct 20, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of BUFQ · 0% of STEN

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · BUFQ holdings · STEN holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.