BUFQ vs TEND

FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF against iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Dec ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
50 bp
TEND is cheaper
1-year return gap
3.5 pts
BUFQ is ahead
Larger fund
BUFQ
$1.7B

Side by side

BUFQTEND
FundFT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETFiShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Dec ETF
IssuerFT VestiShares
CategoryBufferBuffer
Expense ratio1.00%0.50%
Assets$1.7B$69M
Average daily dollar volume$8.6M$235K
ListedJun 15, 2022Oct 8, 2025
FrenzyCap score3336
1-month return+3.4%+2.2%
3-month return+5.2%+3.8%
Year to date+14.2%+11.5%
1-year return+16.7%+13.2%
30-day volatility6.6%5.8%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−5.4%−5.9%
Trailing 12-month yield—0.13%
Holdings59
Top 10 weight99.9%101.3%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$155M thru May 2026−$161M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of May 31, 2026SEC filingas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of BUFQ · 0% of TEND

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · BUFQ holdings · TEND holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.