BUFR vs PBQQ

FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF against PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
45 bp
PBQQ is cheaper
1-year return gap
2.7 pts
PBQQ is ahead
Larger fund
BUFR
$10.9B

Side by side

BUFRPBQQ
FundFT Vest Laddered Buffer ETFPGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF
IssuerFT VestPGIM
CategoryBufferBuffer
Expense ratio0.95%0.50%
Assets$10.9B$95M
Average daily dollar volume$47M$490K
ListedAug 10, 2020Dec 27, 2024
FrenzyCap score4940
1-month return+2.1%+2.9%
3-month return+3.5%+4.6%
Year to date+10.7%+13.4%
1-year return+13.2%+15.9%
30-day volatility5.2%6.0%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−4.6%−4.7%
Trailing 12-month yield—0.01%
Holdings135
Top 10 weight83.3%99.9%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$454M thru May 2026+$15M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of May 31, 2026SEC filingas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of BUFR · 0% of PBQQ

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · BUFR holdings · PBQQ holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.