BUFR vs QJUN

FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF against FT Vest Growth-100 Buffer ETF - June: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
5 bp
QJUN is cheaper
1-year return gap
4.5 pts
BUFR is ahead
Larger fund
BUFR
$10.9B

Side by side

BUFRQJUN
FundFT Vest Laddered Buffer ETFFT Vest Growth-100 Buffer ETF - June
IssuerFT VestFT Vest
CategoryBufferBuffer
Expense ratio0.95%0.90%
Assets$10.9B$731M
Average daily dollar volume$45M$892K
ListedAug 10, 2020Jun 18, 2021
FrenzyCap score4924
1-month return+0.5%−1.9%
3-month return+3.8%+4.3%
Year to date+10.5%+6.3%
1-year return+12.7%+8.2%
30-day volatility5.2%12.1%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−4.6%−6.7%
Trailing 12-month yield——
Holdings135
Top 10 weight83.4%103.2%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$454M thru May 2026+$14M thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Oct 20, 2026issuer dataas of Oct 20, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · BUFR holdings · QJUN holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.