BUFR vs QMFE

FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF against FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - February: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
5 bp
QMFE is cheaper
1-year return gap
2.2 pts
QMFE is ahead
Larger fund
BUFR
$10.9B

Side by side

BUFRQMFE
FundFT Vest Laddered Buffer ETFFT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - February
IssuerFT VestFT Vest
CategoryBufferBuffer
Expense ratio0.95%0.90%
Assets$10.9B$50M
Average daily dollar volume$47M$209K
ListedAug 10, 2020Feb 20, 2025
FrenzyCap score498
1-month return+2.1%+2.0%
3-month return+3.5%+3.9%
Year to date+10.7%+12.8%
1-year return+13.2%+15.4%
30-day volatility5.2%3.6%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−4.6%−4.8%
Trailing 12-month yield——
Holdings1317
Top 10 weight83.3%114.7%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$454M thru May 2026+$8.8M thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of May 31, 2026SEC filingas of May 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · BUFR holdings · QMFE holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.