BUFR vs SPD

FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF against Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
42 bp
SPD is cheaper
1-year return gap
6.8 pts
BUFR is ahead
Larger fund
BUFR
$10.9B

Side by side

BUFRSPD
FundFT Vest Laddered Buffer ETFSimplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF
IssuerFT VestSimplify
CategoryBufferBuffer
Expense ratio0.95%0.53%
Assets$10.9B$107M
Average daily dollar volume$45M$392K
ListedAug 10, 2020Sep 3, 2020
FrenzyCap score4939
1-month return+0.5%−1.6%
3-month return+3.8%+2.6%
Year to date+10.5%+6.7%
1-year return+12.7%+5.9%
30-day volatility5.2%13.9%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−4.6%−12.4%
Trailing 12-month yield—1.19%
Holdings1321
Top 10 weight83.4%100.1%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$454M thru May 2026−$7.8M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility—17.3%
Holdings as ofas of Oct 20, 2026issuer dataas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of BUFR · 0% of SPD

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · BUFR holdings · SPD holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.