BUFR vs TENM

FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF against iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Mar ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
45 bp
TENM is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
BUFR
$10.9B

Side by side

BUFRTENM
FundFT Vest Laddered Buffer ETFiShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Mar ETF
IssuerFT VestiShares
CategoryBufferBuffer
Expense ratio0.95%0.50%
Assets$10.9B$46M
Average daily dollar volume$47M$52K
ListedAug 10, 2020Oct 21, 2025
FrenzyCap score4931
1-month return+2.1%+1.7%
3-month return+3.5%+3.4%
Year to date+10.7%+10.3%
1-year return+13.2%—
30-day volatility5.2%3.9%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−4.6%−3.6%
Trailing 12-month yield—0.27%
Holdings136
Top 10 weight83.3%104.9%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$454M thru May 2026−$5.3M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of May 31, 2026SEC filingas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of BUFR · 0% of TENM

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · BUFR holdings · TENM holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.