CANE vs PDBA

Teucrium Sugar Fund against Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
17.5 pts
CANE is ahead
Larger fund
PDBA
$305M

Side by side

CANEPDBA
FundTeucrium Sugar FundInvesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
IssuerTeucriumInvesco
CategoryAgricultureAgriculture
Expense ratio—0.59%
Assets$57M$305M
Average daily dollar volume$5.5M$9.8M
ListedSep 16, 2011Aug 24, 2022
FrenzyCap score4558
1-month return+10.2%−1.6%
3-month return+26.1%−0.2%
Year to date+25.7%+10.7%
1-year return+24.0%+6.5%
30-day volatility23.0%11.0%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−14.9%−8.6%
Trailing 12-month yield—3.00%
Holdings—16
Top 10 weight—3.0%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months—−$6.6M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility30.6%18.1%
Holdings as ofas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · CANE holdings · PDBA holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.