CBON vs FBND
VanEck China Bond ETF against Fidelity Total Bond ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.
Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
14 bp
FBND is cheaper
1-year return gap
14.4 pts
CBON is ahead
Larger fund
FBND
$28.2B
Side by side
| CBON | FBND | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | VanEck China Bond ETF | Fidelity Total Bond ETF |
| Issuer | VanEck | Fidelity |
| Category | Core Bond | Core Bond |
| Expense ratio | 0.50% | 0.36% |
| Assets | $34M | $28.2B |
| Average daily dollar volume | $268K | $210M |
| Listed | Nov 10, 2014 | Oct 6, 2014 |
| FrenzyCap score | 28 | 79 |
| 1-month return | −0.2% | −1.3% |
| 3-month return | +0.9% | −2.6% |
| Year to date | +5.8% | −5.0% |
| 1-year return | +8.1% | −6.4% |
| 30-day volatility | 2.4% | 5.4% |
| Worst drawdown, 1 year | −1.5% | −7.7% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | 1.42% | 4.83% |
| Holdings | 43 | 4,880 |
| Top 10 weight | 40.7% | 14.6% |
| Look-through P/E | — | — |
| Holdings vs fair value | — | — |
| Holdings above 200-day average | — | — |
| Net flow, latest 3 reported months | +$4.7M thru Jun 2026 | +$1.6B thru May 2026 |
| 30-day implied volatility | — | 8.5% |
| Holdings as of | as of Oct 20, 2026issuer data | as of Oct 20, 2026issuer data |
Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.
Largest shared holdings
0% of CBON · 0% of FBNDNo holdings in common.
Sector mix of the stock holdings
| Sector | CBON | FBND | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 0.0% | 0.0% | −0.0% |
| Utilities | 0.0% | 0.0% | −0.0% |
More: full overlap table · CBON holdings · FBND holdings
Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.