CEFS vs IALT

Saba Opportunistically Hedged Closed-End Funds ETF against iShares Systematic Alternatives Active ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
162 bp
IALT is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
IALT
$7.7B

Side by side

CEFSIALT
FundSaba Opportunistically Hedged Closed-End Funds ETFiShares Systematic Alternatives Active ETF
IssuerSabaiShares
CategoryMulti-StrategyMulti-Strategy
Expense ratio2.61%0.99%
Assets$426M$7.7B
Average daily dollar volume$2.2M$110M
ListedMar 20, 2017Dec 9, 2025
FrenzyCap score3672
1-month return−4.1%−0.4%
3-month return−4.5%+3.1%
Year to date+4.7%+17.7%
1-year return+5.9%—
30-day volatility12.8%6.3%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−7.4%−2.3%
Trailing 12-month yield7.93%0.38%
Holdings742,199
Top 10 weight50.8%58.1%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value—+0.1%
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$2.8M thru May 2026+$822M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of May 31, 2026SEC filingas of Oct 19, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of CEFS · 0% of IALT

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorCEFSIALTGap
Technology0.0%0.2%−0.2%

More: full overlap table · CEFS holdings · IALT holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.