CGBL vs SNAV

Capital Group Core Balanced ETF against Mohr Sector Nav ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
126 bp
CGBL is cheaper
1-year return gap
7.1 pts
SNAV is ahead
Larger fund
CGBL
$7.7B

Side by side

CGBLSNAV
FundCapital Group Core Balanced ETFMohr Sector Nav ETF
IssuerCapital GroupMohr
CategoryAllocationAllocation
Expense ratio0.33%1.59%
Assets$7.7B$34M
Average daily dollar volume$49M$218K
ListedSep 26, 2023Jan 10, 2023
FrenzyCap score758
1-month return−0.8%+2.6%
3-month return−0.5%+2.3%
Year to date+5.2%+12.8%
1-year return+6.2%+13.3%
30-day volatility9.0%9.6%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−7.9%−6.5%
Trailing 12-month yield1.94%—
Holdings778
Top 10 weight59.3%97.1%
Look-through P/E27.1—
Holdings vs fair value+0.9%—
Holdings above 200-day average64%—
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$1.0B thru Jun 2026+$963K thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · CGBL holdings · SNAV holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.