CGBL vs TSPX

Capital Group Core Balanced ETF against Twin Oak Active Opportunities ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
68 bp
CGBL is cheaper
1-year return gap
5.4 pts
TSPX is ahead
Larger fund
CGBL
$7.7B

Side by side

CGBLTSPX
FundCapital Group Core Balanced ETFTwin Oak Active Opportunities ETF
IssuerCapital GroupTwin Oak
CategoryAllocationAllocation
Expense ratio0.33%1.01%
Assets$7.7B$273M
Average daily dollar volume$49M$5K
ListedSep 26, 2023Feb 20, 2025
FrenzyCap score7515
1-month return−0.8%+2.5%
3-month return−0.5%+3.5%
Year to date+5.2%+11.6%
1-year return+6.2%+11.6%
30-day volatility9.0%8.6%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−7.9%−8.1%
Trailing 12-month yield1.94%1.93%
Holdings774
Top 10 weight59.3%100.0%
Look-through P/E27.1—
Holdings vs fair value+0.9%—
Holdings above 200-day average64%—
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$1.0B thru Jun 2026$0 thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of May 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of CGBL · 0% of TSPX

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorCGBLTSPXGap
Technology23.2%0.0%+23.2%
Industrials11.1%0.0%+11.1%
Financials5.6%0.0%+5.6%
Health Care4.4%0.0%+4.4%
Materials3.4%0.0%+3.4%
Consumer Staples2.6%0.0%+2.6%
Consumer Discretionary2.4%0.0%+2.4%
Utilities1.7%0.0%+1.7%
Energy1.0%0.0%+1.0%
Communication Services0.7%0.0%+0.7%

More: full overlap table · CGBL holdings · TSPX holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.