CGRO vs KURE

CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF against KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
7%
2 shared positions
Fee gap
24 bp
KURE is cheaper
1-year return gap
35.5 pts
KURE is ahead
Larger fund
KURE
$110M

Side by side

CGROKURE
FundCoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETFKraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF
IssuerCoreValuesKraneShares
CategorySingle CountrySingle Country
Expense ratio0.89%0.65%
Assets$1.6M$110M
Average daily dollar volume$19K$1.5M
ListedOct 2, 2023Jan 31, 2018
FrenzyCap score1238
1-month return−22.1%+5.2%
3-month return−23.3%+11.0%
Year to date−38.8%+9.9%
1-year return−48.1%−12.6%
30-day volatility63.0%29.4%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−49.8%−29.7%
Trailing 12-month yield29.94%3.82%
Holdings3263
Top 10 weight54.5%53.9%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$589K thru Jun 2026−$3.3M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility—51.2%
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

7% of CGRO · 10% of KURE
HoldingCGROKURE
WuXi AppTec Co Ltd4.89%5.79%
Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceutical2.31%4.59%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorCGROKUREGap
Industrials16.3%0.0%+16.3%
Consumer Discretionary10.8%0.0%+10.8%
Technology3.2%0.0%+3.2%
Financials1.6%0.0%+1.6%
Health Care0.0%1.3%−1.3%
Real Estate1.1%0.0%+1.1%

More: full overlap table · CGRO holdings · KURE holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.