CMF vs GMNY
iShares California Muni Bond ETF against Goldman Sachs Dynamic New York Municipal Income ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.
Fee gap
22 bp
CMF is cheaper
1-year return gap
1.1 pts
GMNY is ahead
Larger fund
CMF
$4.9B
Side by side
| CMF | GMNY | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | iShares California Muni Bond ETF | Goldman Sachs Dynamic New York Municipal Income ETF |
| Issuer | iShares | Goldman Sachs |
| Category | State Muni | State Muni |
| Expense ratio | 0.08% | 0.30% |
| Assets | $4.9B | $48M |
| Average daily dollar volume | $137M | $1000K |
| Listed | Oct 4, 2007 | Jul 23, 2024 |
| FrenzyCap score | 97 | 44 |
| 1-month return | −1.7% | −1.6% |
| 3-month return | −5.5% | −4.8% |
| Year to date | −5.8% | −4.5% |
| 1-year return | −5.1% | −4.0% |
| 30-day volatility | 6.0% | 5.5% |
| Worst drawdown, 1 year | −8.1% | −6.7% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | 3.12% | 3.55% |
| Holdings | 1,833 | 194 |
| Top 10 weight | 4.0% | 12.4% |
| Look-through P/E | — | — |
| Holdings vs fair value | — | — |
| Holdings above 200-day average | — | — |
| Net flow, latest 3 reported months | +$349M thru May 2026 | +$6.2M thru May 2026 |
| 30-day implied volatility | — | — |
| Holdings as of | as of Oct 8, 2026issuer data | as of May 31, 2026SEC filing |
Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.
More: full overlap table · CMF holdings · GMNY holdings
Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.