CMF vs MINN

iShares California Muni Bond ETF against Mairs & Power Minnesota Municipal Bond ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
17 bp
CMF is cheaper
1-year return gap
1.0 pts
CMF is ahead
Larger fund
CMF
$5.5B

Side by side

CMFMINN
FundiShares California Muni Bond ETFMairs & Power Minnesota Municipal Bond ETF
IssueriSharesMairs
CategoryState MuniState Muni
Expense ratio0.08%0.25%
Assets$5.5B$55M
Average daily dollar volume$140M$453K
ListedOct 4, 2007Mar 11, 2021
FrenzyCap score9848
1-month return+4.2%+5.4%
3-month return−0.9%−1.2%
Year to date−2.1%−3.3%
1-year return−1.8%−2.8%
30-day volatility5.1%9.2%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−8.1%−9.7%
Trailing 12-month yield3.02%3.12%
Holdings1,907127
Top 10 weight4.2%22.9%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$291M thru Aug 2026+$5.5M thru Sep 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Nov 6, 2026issuer dataas of Sep 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of CMF · 0% of MINN

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · CMF holdings · MINN holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.