CMF vs NYF

iShares California Muni Bond ETF against iShares New York Muni Bond ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
1 bp
CMF is cheaper
1-year return gap
0.2 pts
CMF is ahead
Larger fund
CMF
$5.2B

Side by side

CMFNYF
FundiShares California Muni Bond ETFiShares New York Muni Bond ETF
IssueriSharesiShares
CategoryState MuniState Muni
Expense ratio0.08%0.09%
Assets$5.2B$1.7B
Average daily dollar volume$159M$40M
ListedOct 4, 2007Oct 4, 2007
FrenzyCap score9890
1-month return−0.2%−0.4%
3-month return−2.8%−3.0%
Year to date−4.4%−4.3%
1-year return−4.6%−4.8%
30-day volatility6.1%6.4%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−8.1%−8.1%
Trailing 12-month yield3.07%3.27%
Holdings1,8631,018
Top 10 weight4.1%5.3%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$349M thru May 2026+$115M thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Oct 20, 2026issuer dataas of Oct 20, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of CMF · 0% of NYF

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · CMF holdings · NYF holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.