CMF vs PZT
iShares California Muni Bond ETF against Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.
Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
20 bp
CMF is cheaper
1-year return gap
3.0 pts
CMF is ahead
Larger fund
CMF
$5.2B
Side by side
| CMF | PZT | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | iShares California Muni Bond ETF | Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF |
| Issuer | iShares | Invesco |
| Category | State Muni | State Muni |
| Expense ratio | 0.08% | 0.28% |
| Assets | $5.2B | $130M |
| Average daily dollar volume | $159M | $2.1M |
| Listed | Oct 4, 2007 | Oct 11, 2007 |
| FrenzyCap score | 98 | 55 |
| 1-month return | −0.2% | −1.2% |
| 3-month return | −2.8% | −5.4% |
| Year to date | −4.4% | −6.8% |
| 1-year return | −4.6% | −7.6% |
| 30-day volatility | 6.1% | 11.3% |
| Worst drawdown, 1 year | −8.1% | −10.9% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | 3.07% | 4.08% |
| Holdings | 1,863 | 1,029 |
| Top 10 weight | 4.1% | 9.5% |
| Look-through P/E | — | — |
| Holdings vs fair value | — | — |
| Holdings above 200-day average | — | — |
| Net flow, latest 3 reported months | +$349M thru May 2026 | +$4.5M thru May 2026 |
| 30-day implied volatility | — | — |
| Holdings as of | as of Oct 20, 2026issuer data | as of May 31, 2026SEC filing |
Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.
Largest shared holdings
0% of CMF · 0% of PZTNo holdings in common.
Sector mix of the stock holdings
No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.
More: full overlap table · CMF holdings · PZT holdings
Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.