COPX vs EMET

Global X Copper Miners ETF (NEW) against VanEck Copper and Electrification Metals ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
10%
3 shared positions
Fee gap
3 bp
EMET is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
COPX
$7.3B

Side by side

COPXEMET
FundGlobal X Copper Miners ETF (NEW)VanEck Copper and Electrification Metals ETF
IssuerGlobal XVanEck
CategoryMetals & MiningEVs & Batteries
Expense ratio0.65%0.62%
Assets$7.3B$35M
Average daily dollar volume$233M$164K
ListedApr 19, 2010Nov 9, 2021
FrenzyCap score6330
1-month return−3.2%−4.2%
3-month return+15.3%+10.1%
Year to date+19.4%—
1-year return+33.7%—
30-day volatility39.1%32.1%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−27.8%−25.6%
Trailing 12-month yield2.25%—
Holdings4660
Top 10 weight42.3%51.4%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$126M thru Jul 2026+$2.8M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility41.4%32.7%
Holdings as ofas of Oct 9, 2026issuer dataas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

12% of COPX · 13% of EMET
HoldingCOPXEMET
FCX5.20%8.14%
SCCO5.47%3.77%
TGB1.70%0.59%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorCOPXEMETGap
Materials13.0%30.4%−17.4%

More: full overlap table · COPX holdings · EMET holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.