COSW vs QQQI

Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF against NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
2%
1 shared positions
Fee gap
31 bp
QQQI is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
QQQI
$15.1B

Side by side

COSWQQQI
FundRoundhill COST WeeklyPay ETFNEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF
IssuerRoundhillNEOS
CategoryCovered CallCovered Call
Expense ratio0.99%0.68%
Assets$12M$15.1B
Average daily dollar volume$107K$219M
ListedOct 22, 2025Jan 29, 2024
FrenzyCap score1381
1-month return+4.0%+4.0%
3-month return−3.3%+1.6%
Year to date−10.4%+4.5%
1-year return—+2.4%
30-day volatility17.7%12.0%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−28.1%−13.7%
Trailing 12-month yield27.97%13.58%
Holdings4105
Top 10 weight87.9%45.1%
Look-through P/E45.534.5
Holdings vs fair value−0.6%−3.8%
Holdings above 200-day average0%77%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months−$452K thru Jun 2026+$2.4B thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility19.9%13.2%
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

9% of COSW · 2% of QQQI
HoldingCOSWQQQI
COST8.50%1.77%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorCOSWQQQIGap
Technology0.0%65.8%−65.8%
Consumer Discretionary8.5%14.0%−5.5%
Industrials0.0%6.4%−6.4%
Health Care0.0%3.6%−3.6%
Communication Services0.0%2.9%−2.9%
Consumer Staples0.0%1.9%−1.9%
Utilities0.0%1.2%−1.2%
Energy0.0%0.2%−0.2%
Financials0.0%0.1%−0.1%

More: full overlap table · COSW holdings · QQQI holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.