COSW vs QYLD

Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF against Global X Funds Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
2%
1 shared positions
Fee gap
39 bp
QYLD is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
QYLD
$8.5B

Side by side

COSWQYLD
FundRoundhill COST WeeklyPay ETFGlobal X Funds Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF
IssuerRoundhillGlobal X
CategoryCovered CallCovered Call
Expense ratio0.99%0.60%
Assets$12M$8.5B
Average daily dollar volume$107K$69M
ListedOct 22, 2025Dec 11, 2013
FrenzyCap score1382
1-month return+4.0%+2.5%
3-month return−3.3%+3.0%
Year to date−10.4%+5.8%
1-year return—+8.9%
30-day volatility17.7%5.6%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−28.1%−7.0%
Trailing 12-month yield27.97%11.40%
Holdings4104
Top 10 weight87.9%49.2%
Look-through P/E45.535.0
Holdings vs fair value−0.6%−4.8%
Holdings above 200-day average0%79%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months−$452K thru Jun 2026−$250M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility19.9%15.8%
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of Oct 9, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

9% of COSW · 2% of QYLD
HoldingCOSWQYLD
COST8.50%1.82%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorCOSWQYLDGap
Technology0.0%73.2%−73.2%
Consumer Discretionary8.5%14.2%−5.7%
Industrials0.0%6.4%−6.4%
Health Care0.0%4.3%−4.3%
Communication Services0.0%2.5%−2.5%
Consumer Staples0.0%1.8%−1.8%
Utilities0.0%1.1%−1.1%
Materials0.0%1.0%−1.0%
Financials0.0%0.2%−0.2%
Energy0.0%0.2%−0.2%

More: full overlap table · COSW holdings · QYLD holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.