CQQQ vs KWEB

Invesco China Technology ETF against KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
31%
10 shared positions
Fee gap
5 bp
CQQQ is cheaper
1-year return gap
15.9 pts
CQQQ is ahead
Larger fund
KWEB
$4.4B

Side by side

CQQQKWEB
FundInvesco China Technology ETFKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
IssuerInvescoKraneShares
CategorySingle CountrySingle Country
Expense ratio0.65%0.70%
Assets$2.2B$4.4B
Average daily dollar volume$51M$397M
ListedDec 8, 2009Jul 31, 2013
FrenzyCap score5861
1-month return−14.4%−6.4%
3-month return−18.4%−9.6%
Year to date−20.9%−30.3%
1-year return−25.3%−41.2%
30-day volatility22.1%21.9%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−30.4%−42.9%
Trailing 12-month yield2.74%8.83%
Holdings18334
Top 10 weight57.8%60.0%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$368M thru Jul 2026−$282M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility34.1%28.4%
Holdings as ofas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filingas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

39% of CQQQ · 36% of KWEB
HoldingCQQQKWEB
Tencent Holdings Ltd.10.58%10.44%
PDD11.12%7.92%
Baidu, Inc.8.39%4.19%
Kuaishou Technology4.91%4.08%
TME1.36%3.39%
Kingsoft Corp. Ltd.0.96%2.09%
Meitu, Inc.0.57%1.00%
JOYY0.54%1.28%
ATHM0.39%0.85%
China Literature Ltd.0.30%0.82%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorCQQQKWEBGap
Industrials11.1%7.9%+3.2%
Technology0.9%10.0%−9.0%
Consumer Discretionary0.0%5.4%−5.4%
Communication Services1.4%3.4%−2.0%
Financials0.0%1.0%−1.0%

More: full overlap table · CQQQ holdings · KWEB holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.