CRY vs QQQI

GraniteShares YieldBOOST CRCL ETF against NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
QQQI
$14.7B

Side by side

CRYQQQI
FundGraniteShares YieldBOOST CRCL ETFNEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF
IssuerGraniteSharesNEOS
CategoryCovered CallCovered Call
Expense ratio—0.68%
Assets—$14.7B
Average daily dollar volume$170K$284M
ListedApr 27, 2026Jan 29, 2024
FrenzyCap score—82
1-month return−13.5%−9.3%
3-month return−22.8%−8.3%
Year to date—−5.7%
1-year return—−6.1%
30-day volatility23.2%26.1%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−47.7%−15.3%
Trailing 12-month yield68.02%15.03%
Holdings—107
Top 10 weight—46.4%
Look-through P/E—27.7
Holdings vs fair value—−0.4%
Holdings above 200-day average—53%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months—+$2.4B thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility—17.4%
Holdings as ofas of Nov 3, 2026third-party data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · CRY holdings · QQQI holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.