CSEN vs IXC

Cohen & Steers Future of Energy Active ETF against iShares Global Energy ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
IXC
$3.2B

Side by side

CSENIXC
FundCohen & Steers Future of Energy Active ETFiShares Global Energy ETF
IssuerCohen & SteersiShares
CategoryEnergyEnergy
Expense ratio—0.37%
Assets—$3.2B
Average daily dollar volume$1.3M$38M
ListedDec 20, 2013Nov 12, 2001
FrenzyCap score—66
1-month return+0.0%+4.3%
3-month return+6.3%+14.7%
Year to date—+46.4%
1-year return—+51.1%
30-day volatility17.0%19.7%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−6.3%−16.5%
Trailing 12-month yield0.67%2.56%
Holdings—65
Top 10 weight—60.6%
Look-through P/E—20.4
Holdings vs fair value—+14.8%
Holdings above 200-day average—86%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months—−$463M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility—25.2%
Holdings as ofas of Oct 14, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · CSEN holdings · IXC holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.