CTA vs DBMF
Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF against iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.
Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
10 bp
CTA is cheaper
1-year return gap
11.3 pts
DBMF is ahead
Larger fund
DBMF
$3.9B
Side by side
| CTA | DBMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF | iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF |
| Issuer | Simplify | iMGP |
| Category | Managed Futures | Managed Futures |
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.85% |
| Assets | $1.5B | $3.9B |
| Average daily dollar volume | $22M | $132M |
| Listed | Mar 7, 2022 | May 7, 2019 |
| FrenzyCap score | 60 | 65 |
| 1-month return | +2.8% | +2.4% |
| 3-month return | +7.4% | +4.6% |
| Year to date | +9.9% | +17.0% |
| 1-year return | +5.1% | +16.4% |
| 30-day volatility | 27.6% | 11.2% |
| Worst drawdown, 1 year | −22.0% | −6.1% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | 5.07% | 4.83% |
| Holdings | 118 | 18 |
| Top 10 weight | 97.0% | 79.0% |
| Look-through P/E | — | — |
| Holdings vs fair value | — | — |
| Holdings above 200-day average | — | — |
| Net flow, latest 3 reported months | +$232M thru Jun 2026 | +$539M thru Jun 2026 |
| 30-day implied volatility | 22.5% | 37.8% |
| Holdings as of | as of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing | as of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing |
Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.
Largest shared holdings
0% of CTA · 0% of DBMFNo holdings in common.
Sector mix of the stock holdings
No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.
More: full overlap table · CTA holdings · DBMF holdings
Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.