CTA vs LFEQ

Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF against VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
17 bp
LFEQ is cheaper
1-year return gap
10.9 pts
LFEQ is ahead
Larger fund
CTA
$1.5B

Side by side

CTALFEQ
FundSimplify Managed Futures Strategy ETFVanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF
IssuerSimplifyVanEck
CategoryManaged FuturesManaged Futures
Expense ratio0.75%0.58%
Assets$1.5B$28M
Average daily dollar volume$21M$42K
ListedMar 7, 2022Oct 4, 2017
FrenzyCap score6133
1-month return+3.0%−0.1%
3-month return+4.4%+4.9%
Year to date+9.8%+13.7%
1-year return+4.0%+14.8%
30-day volatility26.3%10.4%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−22.0%−9.1%
Trailing 12-month yield5.08%0.80%
Holdings1183
Top 10 weight97.0%100.0%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$232M thru Jun 2026−$1.5M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility23.1%—
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of Oct 20, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of CTA · 0% of LFEQ

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · CTA holdings · LFEQ holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.