CTAP vs IMF

Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF against Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
55 bp
CTAP is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
IMF
$301M

Side by side

CTAPIMF
FundSimplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETFInvesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF
IssuerSimplifyInvesco
CategoryManaged FuturesManaged Futures
Expense ratio0.10%0.65%
Assets$163M$301M
Average daily dollar volume$924K$389K
ListedDec 8, 2025Mar 17, 2025
FrenzyCap score4943
1-month return−2.9%−1.5%
3-month return+10.8%+2.7%
Year to date+18.2%+14.9%
1-year return—+17.6%
30-day volatility24.7%6.9%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−21.4%−4.5%
Trailing 12-month yield2.64%0.88%
Holdings3179
Top 10 weight111.5%65.9%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$48M thru Jun 2026+$19M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of Oct 14, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of CTAP · 0% of IMF

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · CTAP holdings · IMF holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.