DFII vs QYLD

FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF against Global X Funds Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
25 bp
QYLD is cheaper
1-year return gap
43.9 pts
QYLD is ahead
Larger fund
QYLD
$8.4B

Side by side

DFIIQYLD
FundFT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETFGlobal X Funds Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF
IssuerFT VestGlobal X
CategoryCovered CallCovered Call
Expense ratio0.85%0.60%
Assets$21M$8.4B
Average daily dollar volume$119K$74M
ListedApr 2, 2025Dec 11, 2013
FrenzyCap score2683
1-month return−2.8%−0.9%
3-month return+19.0%+4.2%
Year to date−20.3%+4.0%
1-year return−37.4%+6.5%
30-day volatility29.3%8.6%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−52.7%−7.0%
Trailing 12-month yield18.95%11.64%
Holdings8104
Top 10 weight1790.2%48.5%
Look-through P/E—32.0
Holdings vs fair value—−1.1%
Holdings above 200-day average—70%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$1.5M thru Jun 2026−$250M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility—32.6%
Holdings as ofas of Oct 20, 2026issuer dataas of Oct 21, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · DFII holdings · QYLD holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.