DQSE vs SPBU

FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Dual Directional Buffer ETF - September against AllianzIM Buffer15 Uncapped Allocation ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
11 bp
SPBU is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
SPBU
$178M

Side by side

DQSESPBU
FundFT Vest Nasdaq-100 Dual Directional Buffer ETF - SeptemberAllianzIM Buffer15 Uncapped Allocation ETF
IssuerFT VestAllianzIM
CategoryAccelerated & BarrierAccelerated & Barrier
Expense ratio0.90%0.79%
Assets—$178M
Average daily dollar volume$1.6M$938K
ListedSep 18, 2026Mar 5, 2025
FrenzyCap score2136
1-month return—+2.2%
3-month return—+2.7%
Year to date—+10.2%
1-year return—+11.1%
30-day volatility—8.9%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−0.7%−7.1%
Trailing 12-month yield——
Holdings—12
Top 10 weight—83.5%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months—+$24M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · DQSE holdings · SPBU holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.