EDGH vs LCR

3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF against Leuthold Core ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
11%
2 shared positions
Fee gap
18 bp
LCR is cheaper
1-year return gap
8.5 pts
EDGH is ahead
Larger fund
EDGH
$179M

Side by side

EDGHLCR
Fund3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETFLeuthold Core ETF
Issuer3EDGELeuthold
CategoryNatural Resources & AgricultureAllocation
Expense ratio1.01%0.83%
Assets$179M$66M
Average daily dollar volume$1.2M$304K
ListedOct 2, 2024Jan 3, 2020
FrenzyCap score1830
1-month return−2.3%+0.4%
3-month return+4.1%+2.3%
Year to date+11.5%+6.3%
1-year return+14.8%+6.3%
30-day volatility14.2%6.1%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−12.5%−6.0%
Trailing 12-month yield1.05%1.29%
Holdings936
Top 10 weight99.5%66.0%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$28M thru Jun 2026−$3.9M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

15% of EDGH · 11% of LCR
HoldingEDGHLCR
STIP9.85%9.54%
VTIP4.65%0.99%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · EDGH holdings · LCR holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.