EFNL vs WOOD

iShares MSCI Finland ETF against iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
7%
2 shared positions
Fee gap
14 bp
WOOD is cheaper
1-year return gap
29.4 pts
EFNL is ahead
Larger fund
EFNL
$391M

Side by side

EFNLWOOD
FundiShares MSCI Finland ETFiShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF
IssueriSharesiShares
CategorySingle CountryNatural Resources & Agriculture
Expense ratio0.53%0.39%
Assets$391M$256M
Average daily dollar volume$3.5M$2.0M
ListedJan 25, 2012Jun 24, 2008
FrenzyCap score4759
1-month return−5.3%−5.4%
3-month return+1.2%−0.6%
Year to date+9.7%−7.4%
1-year return+23.0%−6.5%
30-day volatility20.1%13.5%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−12.6%−21.6%
Trailing 12-month yield1.03%2.52%
Holdings3844
Top 10 weight74.8%53.9%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$11M thru May 2026−$182K thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility—22.3%
Holdings as ofas of Oct 8, 2026issuer dataas of Oct 8, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

7% of EFNL · 8% of WOOD
HoldingEFNLWOOD
UPM4.59%4.25%
STERV2.40%4.15%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorEFNLWOODGap
Materials0.0%13.3%−13.3%
Real Estate0.0%12.0%−12.0%
Technology0.0%4.0%−4.0%

More: full overlap table · EFNL holdings · WOOD holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.