EHCC vs QYLD

Global X Ethereum Covered Call ETF against Global X Funds Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
1 shared positions
Fee gap
15 bp
QYLD is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
QYLD
$8.5B

Side by side

EHCCQYLD
FundGlobal X Ethereum Covered Call ETFGlobal X Funds Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF
IssuerGlobal XGlobal X
CategoryCovered CallCovered Call
Expense ratio0.75%0.60%
Assets$1.2M$8.5B
Average daily dollar volume$10K$69M
ListedApr 1, 2026Dec 11, 2013
FrenzyCap score2682
1-month return−2.5%+2.5%
3-month return+16.6%+3.0%
Year to date—+5.8%
1-year return—+8.9%
30-day volatility31.9%5.6%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−35.4%−7.0%
Trailing 12-month yield16.76%11.40%
Holdings6104
Top 10 weight46.7%49.2%
Look-through P/E—35.0
Holdings vs fair value—−4.8%
Holdings above 200-day average—79%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$591K thru Jul 2026−$250M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility—15.8%
Holdings as ofas of Oct 9, 2026issuer dataas of Oct 9, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

1% of EHCC · 0% of QYLD
HoldingEHCCQYLD
OTHER PAYABLE & RECEIVABLES1.10%0.01%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorEHCCQYLDGap
Technology0.0%73.2%−73.2%
Consumer Discretionary0.0%14.2%−14.2%
Industrials0.0%6.4%−6.4%
Health Care0.0%4.3%−4.3%
Communication Services0.0%2.5%−2.5%
Consumer Staples0.0%1.8%−1.8%
Utilities0.0%1.1%−1.1%
Materials0.0%1.0%−1.0%
Financials0.0%0.2%−0.2%
Energy0.0%0.2%−0.2%

More: full overlap table · EHCC holdings · QYLD holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.