EIPX vs UMI

FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF against USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
29%
13 shared positions
Fee gap
26 bp
UMI is cheaper
1-year return gap
8.6 pts
EIPX is ahead
Larger fund
EIPX
$569M

Side by side

EIPXUMI
FundFT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETFUSCF Midstream Energy Income Fund
IssuerFT VestUSCF
CategoryEnergyMultisector Bond
Expense ratio0.95%0.69%
Assets$569M$516M
Average daily dollar volume$1.1M$1.9M
ListedNov 2, 2022Mar 24, 2021
FrenzyCap score3636
1-month return−3.6%−3.9%
3-month return+0.4%−3.9%
Year to date+22.5%+19.1%
1-year return+23.3%+14.7%
30-day volatility10.8%13.5%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−7.6%−9.2%
Trailing 12-month yield2.78%6.06%
Holdings8523
Top 10 weight33.5%63.1%
Look-through P/E16.417.4
Holdings vs fair value+18.3%+20.3%
Holdings above 200-day average45%56%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$35M thru Jul 2026−$27M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Apr 30, 2026SEC filingas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

29% of EIPX · 76% of UMI
HoldingEIPXUMI
EPD7.11%7.54%
ET6.47%7.74%
MPLX3.75%4.70%
KMI2.59%6.21%
PAGP2.58%4.55%
OKE2.54%4.80%
TRGP1.05%6.87%
KEYUF0.71%4.60%
DTM0.54%6.27%
WMB0.53%7.35%
TRP0.50%4.39%
ENB0.47%7.03%
LNG0.45%3.63%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorEIPXUMIGap
Utilities42.2%55.2%−13.0%
Energy22.1%26.9%−4.8%
Industrials6.6%0.0%+6.6%
Materials2.7%0.0%+2.7%
Other1.2%0.0%+1.2%
Technology0.2%0.0%+0.2%

More: full overlap table · EIPX holdings · UMI holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.