EMC vs EMKT

Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF against Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
5%
4 shared positions
Fee gap
9 bp
EMC is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
EMKT
$181M

Side by side

EMCEMKT
FundGlobal X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETFLazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF
IssuerGlobal XLazard
CategoryEmerging MarketsEmerging Markets
Expense ratio0.65%0.74%
Assets$57M$181M
Average daily dollar volume$152K$379K
ListedSep 24, 2010Oct 31, 2013
FrenzyCap score2331
1-month return+0.1%−0.4%
3-month return+3.7%+2.4%
Year to date+20.6%+24.4%
1-year return+17.0%—
30-day volatility22.0%18.7%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−13.9%−14.2%
Trailing 12-month yield0.56%0.45%
Holdings7874
Top 10 weight40.5%49.5%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months−$1.6M thru May 2026+$6.3M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Oct 9, 2026issuer dataas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

7% of EMC · 12% of EMKT
HoldingEMCEMKT
TSM2.12%8.33%
IBN1.89%1.28%
ITUB2.74%1.16%
MELI0.55%0.98%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorEMCEMKTGap
Financials6.1%5.8%+0.3%
Technology2.1%9.0%−6.8%
Industrials1.5%1.0%+0.5%
Materials1.5%0.0%+1.5%
Real Estate0.0%0.9%−0.9%
Consumer Discretionary0.0%0.6%−0.6%
Energy0.5%0.0%+0.5%

More: full overlap table · EMC holdings · EMKT holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.