EMLC vs TDEM
VanEck J. P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF against T. Rowe Price Dynamic Emerging Markets Bond ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.
Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
EMLC
$4.9B
Side by side
| EMLC | TDEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | VanEck J. P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF | T. Rowe Price Dynamic Emerging Markets Bond ETF |
| Issuer | VanEck | T. Rowe Price |
| Category | Emerging Markets Bond | Emerging Markets Bond |
| Expense ratio | 0.30% | — |
| Assets | $4.9B | — |
| Average daily dollar volume | $62M | $25K |
| Listed | Jul 22, 2010 | Sep 30, 2026 |
| FrenzyCap score | 80 | — |
| 1-month return | −2.4% | — |
| 3-month return | −2.2% | — |
| Year to date | −3.8% | — |
| 1-year return | −2.3% | — |
| 30-day volatility | 7.9% | — |
| Worst drawdown, 1 year | −7.8% | −0.3% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | 6.43% | — |
| Holdings | 513 | — |
| Top 10 weight | 7.7% | — |
| Look-through P/E | — | — |
| Holdings vs fair value | — | — |
| Holdings above 200-day average | — | — |
| Net flow, latest 3 reported months | +$11M thru Jun 2026 | — |
| 30-day implied volatility | 26.1% | — |
| Holdings as of | as of Oct 8, 2026issuer data |
Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.
More: full overlap table · EMLC holdings · TDEM holdings
Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.