EMXC vs MAGC

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF against Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
35 bp
EMXC is cheaper
1-year return gap
80.1 pts
EMXC is ahead
Larger fund
EMXC
$25.8B

Side by side

EMXCMAGC
FundiShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETFRoundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF
IssueriSharesRoundhill
CategorySingle CountrySingle Country
Expense ratio0.25%0.60%
Assets$25.8B$13M
Average daily dollar volume$180M$153K
ListedJul 18, 2017Oct 2, 2024
FrenzyCap score8213
1-month return−0.2%+1.3%
3-month return+5.1%−4.5%
Year to date+36.2%−24.1%
1-year return+42.6%−37.5%
30-day volatility23.4%27.4%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−18.4%−41.8%
Trailing 12-month yield1.94%5.40%
Holdings66417
Top 10 weight44.0%110.2%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$3.1B thru May 2026$0 thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility26.3%39.0%
Holdings as ofas of Oct 8, 2026issuer dataas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of EMXC · 0% of MAGC

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorEMXCMAGCGap
Industrials0.2%8.3%−8.1%
Technology0.3%4.8%−4.4%
Financials1.1%0.0%+1.1%
Materials0.7%0.0%+0.7%
Consumer Discretionary0.3%0.0%+0.3%
Energy0.3%0.0%+0.3%
Utilities0.2%0.0%+0.2%
Consumer Staples0.1%0.0%+0.1%
Health Care0.1%0.0%+0.1%
Communication Services0.1%0.0%+0.1%
Real Estate0.0%0.0%+0.0%

More: full overlap table · EMXC holdings · MAGC holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.