ESBG vs FNDX

First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF against Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
70 bp
FNDX is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
FNDX
$27.7B

Side by side

ESBGFNDX
FundFirst Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETFSchwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF
IssuerFirst TrustSchwab
CategoryMulti-FactorMulti-Factor
Expense ratio0.95%0.25%
Assets$2.1M$27.7B
Average daily dollar volume$13K$113M
ListedNov 19, 2025Aug 15, 2013
FrenzyCap score190
1-month return−1.5%−0.1%
3-month return+2.6%+2.2%
Year to date−1.2%+18.2%
1-year return—+21.6%
30-day volatility21.5%8.4%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−19.3%−6.4%
Trailing 12-month yield1.50%1.47%
Holdings5736
Top 10 weight26.7%22.4%
Look-through P/E—23.8
Holdings vs fair value—+10.8%
Holdings above 200-day average—64%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months$0 thru Jun 2026−$644M thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility—19.6%
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of May 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · ESBG holdings · FNDX holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.