FDAT vs RMRC

Tactical Advantage ETF against ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
28%
4 shared positions
Fee gap
20 bp
RMRC is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
FDAT
$36M

Side by side

FDATRMRC
FundTactical Advantage ETFARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF
IssuerTacticalARMOR
CategoryTactical & RotationBuffer
Expense ratio0.78%0.58%
Assets$36M$7.1M
Average daily dollar volume$23K$29K
ListedApr 19, 2023Feb 23, 2026
FrenzyCap score2632
1-month return−0.5%−0.0%
3-month return+0.0%−0.5%
Year to date+3.2%—
1-year return−2.9%—
30-day volatility6.3%8.5%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−6.4%−6.8%
Trailing 12-month yield5.91%0.94%
Holdings1812
Top 10 weight66.6%93.9%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$436K thru Jun 2026+$6.8M thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of May 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

28% of FDAT · 35% of RMRC
HoldingFDATRMRC
XLV8.37%10.02%
XLU7.99%10.62%
XLI8.14%7.35%
XLF3.97%7.51%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · FDAT holdings · RMRC holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.