FFIU vs PYLD

UVA Unconstrained Medium-Term Fixed Income ETF against PIMCO Multi Sector Bond Active ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
2 shared positions
Fee gap
10 bp
FFIU is cheaper
1-year return gap
3.2 pts
PYLD is ahead
Larger fund
PYLD
$16.1B

Side by side

FFIUPYLD
FundUVA Unconstrained Medium-Term Fixed Income ETFPIMCO Multi Sector Bond Active ETF
IssuerUVAPIMCO
CategoryMultisector BondMultisector Bond
Expense ratio0.54%0.64%
Assets$51M$16.1B
Average daily dollar volume$50K$171M
ListedAug 18, 2017Jun 21, 2023
FrenzyCap score3270
1-month return−1.6%−0.8%
3-month return−4.0%−3.0%
Year to date−6.6%−4.4%
1-year return−7.9%−4.7%
30-day volatility7.7%4.9%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−11.2%−6.7%
Trailing 12-month yield4.32%6.58%
Holdings1302,023
Top 10 weight17.4%24.5%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$1.1M thru Jun 2026—
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of Oct 14, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

2% of FFIU · 0% of PYLD
HoldingFFIUPYLD
FN MA5996, due Mar 1, 20561.33%0.00%
BROADCOM CRP / CAYMN 3.5%, due Jan 15, 20280.37%0.00%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · FFIU holdings · PYLD holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.