FFTY vs IWF
CapForce IBD 50 ETF against iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.
Fee gap
62 bp
IWF is cheaper
1-year return gap
19.4 pts
IWF is ahead
Larger fund
IWF
$114.6B
Side by side
| FFTY | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | CapForce IBD 50 ETF | iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF |
| Issuer | CapForce | iShares |
| Category | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Expense ratio | 0.80% | 0.18% |
| Assets | $86M | $114.6B |
| Average daily dollar volume | $789K | $665M |
| Listed | Apr 8, 2015 | May 22, 2000 |
| FrenzyCap score | 23 | 81 |
| 1-month return | −18.0% | −12.1% |
| 3-month return | −21.6% | −10.0% |
| Year to date | −17.3% | −5.6% |
| 1-year return | −26.2% | −6.9% |
| 30-day volatility | 29.5% | 26.3% |
| Worst drawdown, 1 year | −34.5% | −14.7% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | 1.63% | 0.97% |
| Holdings | — | 377 |
| Top 10 weight | — | 57.3% |
| Look-through P/E | — | 26.6 |
| Holdings vs fair value | — | −1.0% |
| Holdings above 200-day average | — | 43% |
| Net flow, latest 3 reported months | −$13M thru Jan 2026 | −$1.3B thru Jun 2026 |
| 30-day implied volatility | 37.2% | 26.5% |
| Holdings as of | as of Nov 6, 2026issuer data |
Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.
More: full overlap table · FFTY holdings · IWF holdings
Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.