FLRN vs FLRT

State Street SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF against Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
45 bp
FLRN is cheaper
1-year return gap
1.9 pts
FLRN is ahead
Larger fund
FLRN
$3.2B

Side by side

FLRNFLRT
FundState Street SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETFPacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF
IssuerState Street SPDRPacer
CategoryFloating RateFloating Rate
Expense ratio0.15%0.60%
Assets$3.2B$601M
Average daily dollar volume$50M$16M
ListedNov 30, 2011Feb 18, 2015
FrenzyCap score8656
1-month return0.0%−1.0%
3-month return0.0%−0.3%
Year to date+0.2%−1.5%
1-year return−0.0%−1.9%
30-day volatility1.3%2.1%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−0.7%−2.8%
Trailing 12-month yield4.26%6.72%
Holdings551291
Top 10 weight8.1%9.7%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$175M thru Jun 2026+$59M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility16.9%—
Holdings as ofas of Oct 20, 2026issuer dataas of Apr 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of FLRN · 0% of FLRT

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · FLRN holdings · FLRT holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.