FLRT vs FLTR

Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF against VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
46 bp
FLTR is cheaper
1-year return gap
2.2 pts
FLTR is ahead
Larger fund
FLTR
$3.5B

Side by side

FLRTFLTR
FundPacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETFVanEck IG Floating Rate ETF
IssuerPacerVanEck
CategoryFloating RateFloating Rate
Expense ratio0.60%0.14%
Assets$1.0B$3.5B
Average daily dollar volume$15M$43M
ListedFeb 18, 2015Apr 25, 2011
FrenzyCap score5887
1-month return−0.6%−0.0%
3-month return−0.8%−0.0%
Year to date−1.4%+0.3%
1-year return−1.9%+0.2%
30-day volatility2.1%1.1%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−2.8%−0.8%
Trailing 12-month yield6.71%4.42%
Holdings291458
Top 10 weight9.7%9.6%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$59M thru Jul 2026+$332M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility—22.3%
Holdings as ofas of Apr 30, 2026SEC filingas of Oct 14, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of FLRT · 0% of FLTR

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · FLRT holdings · FLTR holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.