FLRT vs VRIG

Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF against Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
30 bp
VRIG is cheaper
1-year return gap
1.6 pts
VRIG is ahead
Larger fund
VRIG
$1.9B

Side by side

FLRTVRIG
FundPacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETFInvesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF
IssuerPacerInvesco
CategoryFloating RateFloating Rate
Expense ratio0.60%0.30%
Assets$601M$1.9B
Average daily dollar volume$16M$22M
ListedFeb 18, 2015Sep 20, 2016
FrenzyCap score5670
1-month return−1.0%−0.2%
3-month return−0.3%−0.2%
Year to date−1.5%−0.5%
1-year return−1.9%−0.3%
30-day volatility2.1%1.4%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−2.8%−0.8%
Trailing 12-month yield6.72%4.53%
Holdings291363
Top 10 weight9.7%25.9%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$59M thru Jul 2026+$360M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Apr 30, 2026SEC filingas of Oct 20, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of FLRT · 0% of VRIG

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · FLRT holdings · VRIG holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.