FLTR vs MBSF

VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF against Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
35 bp
FLTR is cheaper
1-year return gap
0.4 pts
FLTR is ahead
Larger fund
FLTR
$3.6B

Side by side

FLTRMBSF
FundVanEck IG Floating Rate ETFRegan Floating Rate MBS ETF
IssuerVanEckRegan
CategoryFloating RateFloating Rate
Expense ratio0.14%0.49%
Assets$3.6B$236M
Average daily dollar volume$45M$1.8M
ListedApr 25, 2011Feb 27, 2024
FrenzyCap score8749
1-month return−0.1%−0.6%
3-month return−0.0%−0.8%
Year to date+0.4%−0.5%
1-year return+0.2%−0.2%
30-day volatility1.1%2.9%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−0.8%−1.8%
Trailing 12-month yield4.42%4.28%
Holdings455429
Top 10 weight9.5%20.3%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$332M thru Jul 2026+$35M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility23.1%—
Holdings as ofas of Oct 20, 2026issuer dataas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of FLTR · 0% of MBSF

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · FLTR holdings · MBSF holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.