FNGU vs QLD

MicroSectors FANG+ 3x Leveraged ETNs due February 17, 2045 against ProShares Ultra QQQ: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
21.3 pts
QLD is ahead
Larger fund
QLD
$14.5B

Side by side

FNGUQLD
FundMicroSectors FANG+ 3x Leveraged ETNs due February 17, 2045ProShares Ultra QQQ
IssuerMicroSectorsProShares
CategoryLeveraged EquityLeveraged Equity
Expense ratio—0.95%
Assets—$14.5B
Average daily dollar volume$91M$374M
ListedOct 31, 2022Jun 19, 2006
FrenzyCap score—81
1-month return−10.5%−6.5%
3-month return+27.1%+7.6%
Year to date+28.1%+29.9%
1-year return+7.8%+29.2%
30-day volatility54.6%34.9%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−59.6%−25.2%
Trailing 12-month yield—0.14%
Holdings—126
Top 10 weight—111.6%
Look-through P/E—32.0
Holdings vs fair value—−1.1%
Holdings above 200-day average—70%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months—+$197M thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility—42.4%
Holdings as ofas of Oct 21, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · FNGU holdings · QLD holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.