GDMA vs MOOD

Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF against Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
16%
1 shared positions
Fee gap
2 bp
MOOD is cheaper
1-year return gap
18.8 pts
MOOD is ahead
Larger fund
GDMA
$195M

Side by side

GDMAMOOD
FundGadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETFRelative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF
IssuerGadsdenRelative
CategoryAllocationTactical & Rotation
Expense ratio0.75%0.73%
Assets$195M$154M
Average daily dollar volume$346K$1.4M
ListedNov 14, 2018May 18, 2022
FrenzyCap score3034
1-month return−2.7%+1.6%
3-month return−1.7%+3.3%
Year to date+6.1%+17.1%
1-year return+3.0%+21.8%
30-day volatility10.1%3.4%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−7.7%−9.7%
Trailing 12-month yield2.63%0.34%
Holdings2911
Top 10 weight80.3%99.7%
Look-through P/E39.6—
Holdings vs fair value+6.0%—
Holdings above 200-day average92%—
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$8.3M thru Jun 2026+$15M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

29% of GDMA · 16% of MOOD
HoldingGDMAMOOD
BOXX29.14%15.54%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorGDMAMOODGap
Technology14.3%0.0%+14.3%
Industrials2.3%0.0%+2.3%
Materials0.2%0.0%+0.2%

More: full overlap table · GDMA holdings · MOOD holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.