GLTR vs PLTM

abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF against GraniteShares Platinum Shares: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
1.2 pts
PLTM is ahead
Larger fund
GLTR
$2.5B

Side by side

GLTRPLTM
Fundabrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETFGraniteShares Platinum Shares
IssuerabrdnGraniteShares
CategoryPrecious MetalsPrecious Metals
Expense ratio——
Assets$2.5B$177M
Average daily dollar volume$8.6M$2.0M
ListedOct 22, 2010Jan 22, 2018
FrenzyCap score7545
1-month return−8.8%−11.3%
3-month return+0.8%+2.0%
Year to date−11.3%−20.8%
1-year return−2.6%−1.4%
30-day volatility25.6%33.7%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−37.9%−44.1%
Trailing 12-month yield——
Holdings——
Top 10 weight——
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months——
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as of

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · GLTR holdings · PLTM holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.