GMOC vs MINT

GMO Ultra-Short Income ETF against PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
16 bp
GMOC is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
MINT
$18.3B

Side by side

GMOCMINT
FundGMO Ultra-Short Income ETFPIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund
IssuerGMOPIMCO
CategoryUltra-Short BondUltra-Short Bond
Expense ratio0.20%0.36%
Assets$34M$18.3B
Average daily dollar volume$392K$222M
ListedOct 27, 2025Nov 16, 2009
FrenzyCap score4080
1-month return−0.1%−0.1%
3-month return−0.1%−0.1%
Year to date+0.2%+0.1%
1-year return—+0.0%
30-day volatility1.4%1.3%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−0.5%−0.5%
Trailing 12-month yield3.69%4.09%
Holdings711,019
Top 10 weight42.8%13.4%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$21M thru May 2026+$430M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility—3.4%
Holdings as ofas of May 31, 2026SEC filingas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · GMOC holdings · MINT holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.