GPZ vs PCEF

VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF against Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
231 bp
GPZ is cheaper
1-year return gap
16.2 pts
PCEF is ahead
Larger fund
PCEF
$754M

Side by side

GPZPCEF
FundVanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETFInvesco CEF Income Composite ETF
IssuerVanEckInvesco
CategoryMulti-StrategyMulti-Strategy
Expense ratio0.40%2.71%
Assets$224M$754M
Average daily dollar volume$6.0M$2.7M
ListedJun 4, 2025Feb 19, 2010
FrenzyCap score6245
1-month return−5.0%−2.5%
3-month return−3.8%−3.3%
Year to date−21.1%−3.1%
1-year return−18.5%−2.3%
30-day volatility20.6%11.2%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−29.9%−9.5%
Trailing 12-month yield1.05%7.74%
Holdings21110
Top 10 weight70.7%29.1%
Look-through P/E37.8—
Holdings vs fair value+12.9%—
Holdings above 200-day average0%—
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$49M thru Jun 2026+$2.0M thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility—117.0%
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of Oct 20, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of GPZ · 0% of PCEF

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorGPZPCEFGap
Financials64.1%0.0%+64.1%
Real Estate11.9%0.0%+11.9%

More: full overlap table · GPZ holdings · PCEF holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.